Fasting - Water Fasting - Fasting for Health. Historical records tell us that fasting has been used for health recovery for thousands of years. Hippocrates, Socrates, and Plato all recommended fasting for health recovery. The Bible tells us that Moses and Jesus fasted for 4. Mahatma Gandhi fasted for 2. For much of human history, fasting has been guided by intuition and spiritual purpose. Today, our understanding of human physiology confirms the powerful healing effects of fasting. Fasting is a powerful therapeutic process that can help people recover from mild to severe health conditions. Some of the most common ones are high blood pressure, asthma, allergies, chronic headaches, inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease), irritable bowel syndrome, adult onset diabetes, heart disease, degenerative arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, eczema, acne, uterine fibroids, benign tumours, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Fasting provides a period of concentrated physiological rest during which time the body can devote its self- healing mechanisms to repairing and strengthening damaged organs. The process of fasting also allows the body to cleanse cells of accumulated toxins and waste products. Fasting gives the digestive tract time to completely rest and strengthen its mucosal lining. A healthy intestinal mucosal lining is necessary for preventing the leakage of incompletely digested proteins into the bloodstream, thereby offering protection against autoimmune conditions. A healthy digestive tract also helps to protect the blood and inner organs against a variety of environmental and metabolic toxins. A fast that is appropriate for your situation will allow for you to experience some or all of the following: More energy. Healthier skin. Healthier teeth and gums. Better quality sleep. A clean and healthy cardiovascular system. A decrease in anxiety and tension. Dramatic reduction or complete elimination of aches and pains in muscles and joints. Decrease or elimination of headaches. Stabilization of blood pressure. Stronger and more efficient digestion. Stabilization of bowel movements. Loss of excess weight. Elimination of stored toxins. Improvement with a wide variety of chronic degenerative health conditions, including autoimmune disorders. It is important to understand that the detoxifying and healing processes that occur during a fast are also active when a person is consuming food. A fast can be helpful for people whose conditions are not improving as quickly as they would like, or for people who have health conditions that require a concentrated period of healing to resolve. How to lose weight quickly and sustainably with no hunger, no calorie counting, no magic products and no exercise, eating real food.It is also important to understand that the most important part of a fast is how a person lives after the fast. Fasting can provide a clean and revitalized foundation upon which you can build and maintain a strong and well- conditioned body by consistently making healthy food and lifestyle choices. What follows are answers to commonly asked questions about fasting: Q. How do I know if I need to fast? For many people, adopting an unprocessed, whole food diet, engaging in a sensible exercise program, acquiring restful sleep, and living in a relatively unpolluted environment will provide the necessary conditions to recover and maintain vibrant health. If a person is having a difficult time making necessary dietary and lifestyle changes, fasting can be a powerful way of accelerating health recovery. Fasting can also reset the sensitivity of the nervous system, providing an effective way of overcoming dependencies on caffeine, nicotine, alcohol, other recreational drugs, salt, sugar, and other stimulants. After fasting, many people marvel at how sweet romaine lettuce is, how refreshing apples are, and how wonderfully delicious baked potatoes are – without sour cream and butter! Many of us have been eating rich, salty, and sweetened foods for so long that we are unaware of how good foods taste in their natural, unprocessed states. How long should I fast for? If you choose to fast to recover from acute illness, you can fast until you feel well enough to eat again. In the case of a chronic health challenge, the length of the fast is determined by the progress of the fast. The healing processes that take place during a fast are predictable. Blood levels of cholesterol and uric acid tend to elevate during a fast, a result of the body stirring up stores of undesirable materials and expelling them into the circulation to be eliminated from the body. Shortly after the fast, these levels tend to be lower than they were before the fast, indicating a cleaner system. ESR, a marker for inflammation, tends to decrease during the course of a fast. As a part of the detoxification process, some people experience vomiting, diarrhea, headaches, dizziness, skin rashes, and other uncomfortable symptoms. Fasting under the supervision of a health care professional who is trained to distinguish healing responses from harmful processes can be helpful in allowing a person to . The idea is to fast as briefly as possible, but as long as is necessary to allow the body to restore health. There are a handful of exceptional circumstances in which it is not advisable to fast. A small portion of the population has an inborn error of metabolism whereby they lack an enzyme that is needed to process fatty acids. Since fatty acids are needed as an alternate source of energy during a fast, it would not be safe for such a person to pursue a fast of significant duration. This disorder can be recognized early in the fasting process by a trained observer. Can fasting cure specific conditions? Rather, it is an opportunity to give the body a prolonged period of rest to do what it does best – heal and restore itself. The same healing mechanisms that are at work during a fast are also at work while a person is eating. The difference is that during a fast, all of the body's resources are channeled towards its self- healing and restorative mechanisms. A scientifically based guide to intermittent fasting as alternative to traditional weight loss diets. Intermittent fasting is a great way to lose weight while maintaining/gaining muscle mass. It creates many of the same benefits as intense exercise on weight loss. How much weight will I lose if I fast? On average, a typical faster loses approximately one pound per day during a water- only fast. Initially, the loss may approach two or even three pounds per day for the first few days if the person is retaining significant sodium and water. This can decrease to approximately half a pound per day in the later stages of a fast. From day two onward, the body begins utilizing fatty tissues for energy, thereby conserving as much muscle tissue as possible, a mechanism called protein sparing. What is the difference between water fasting and juice fasting? During a water fast, only water is consumed. As these reserves are burned for energy during a fast, any stored toxins will be released into your circulation, to be eliminated through various eliminative channels like your urine and respiratory tract. Won't my metabolism slow down during and after the fast, causing me to gain back more weight over the long haul? Metabolic rate fluctuates according to our moment- to- moment physiological needs. When we are active, our metabolic rate speeds up. When we sleep, our metabolic rate slows down. In the same way, when we fast, our metabolic rate slows down because our physiological needs are lower than they are when we are consuming food and going about our regular activities. When a fast is broken and a person returns to eating and more activity, her metabolic rate increases to match her increasing physiological needs. Fasting provides an opportunity for our digestive organs to heal and make more efficient use of the nutrients in the foods that we consume. Weight gain or loss is always a simple function of how many calories we take in versus how many we expend. If your primary goal is to be at a healthful weight for your unique disposition, the optimal approach is usually to combine an unprocessed, whole food diet with a regular aerobic exercise and strength- training program. Please note: To receive more tips on how to use your food and lifestyle choices to promote steady cleansing and detoxification of your blood and tissues, please feel free to sign up for our free natural health newsletter below.
Intermittent fasting diet for fat loss, muscle gain and health. It's been a good while since I last wrote about intermittent fasting. I guess largely because there's only so much to say about the topic and because I feel like I've said most of it. Unless you're going to make inferences based on animal studies, there's only so much you can extrapolate from the human experience and write about. Another part of it is that I've lost interest. Once your understanding of nutrition is complete, more or less, you reach a point of radically diminishing returns - at this point, expanding your knowledge further in this realm, won't make an iota of difference for your level of fitness. It's much more fruitful to improve your training regimen and understanding thereof. A rich body of research on the topic has been published since then. The ongoing interest in IF is not surprising, given its mystique that’s wrapped in ancient spiritual origins, all the way to its modern applications to clinical and aesthetic goals. The aim of this article is to bring the reader up- to- date on the scientific findings, with a particular focus on comparing IF regimes with conventional/linear dieting. After all, the question is not whether IF works – it obviously does, as does any mode of caloric restriction. The question is whether it works better than conventional dieting for improving body composition, and if so, to which contexts can we apply it. Article continues.. Importantly, they compared the effects of intermittent energy restriction (IER) to continuous energy restriction (CER) on bodyweight, body composition, and other clinical parameters. Their review included 4. IER with a CER condition. They found that overall, the two diet types resulted in “apparently equivalent outcomes” in terms of bodyweight reduction and body composition change. In addition, neither IER or CER was superior to the other at improving glucose control/insulin sensitivity. No different effects on thyroid, cortisol, and sex hormones were seen between IER and CER, though the authors concede that there’s insufficient research comparing neuroendocrine effects of the two diet types to draw definitive conclusions in this area. Interestingly, IER was superior at suppressing hunger. The authors speculated that this might be attributable to ketone production in the fasting phases. However, this effect was somewhat immaterial since it failed to translate into superior improvements in body composition or greater weight loss. MB: Well, that's not quite true. These studies didn't have a suitable control group, as the participants served as their own controls. Thus, you can't say that it didn't translate into . That's the problem with these systematic reviews Like it says in the paper. Only 1. 2 of the 4. IER with CER: the lack of direct comparison makes it difficult to determine whether IER is superior to CER, or for whom. Limitations of the review included the standard ones – relatively small sample sizes, relatively short trial durations, and heterogeneous study designs making comparisons outside of the same study difficult. An acknowledged limitation worth highlighting was that 1. Varady et al, University of Illinois at Chicago). Ideally, a more diversified and less concentrated set of labs is less likely to repeat the same errors or preserve the same biases. Speaking of the potential for bias, Varady has published a lay- directed book titled, The Every- Other- Day Diet (1. I’m not claiming that Varady is destined to make sure her ADF study results will always square up with her book, but it’s one of the potential caveats nevertheless. I would add to these limitations that there’s a severe lack of IER (and IER vs CER) studies that include a structured training component. MB: I agree wholeheartedly. I'm glad Alan brought this up. The opportunities for fuckery in the scientific literature are endless. Usually, industry is the culprit - you know, studies praising the benefits of snacks or breakfast (sponsored by Kellogg's or General Mills) or studies on the tremendous muscle- building effects of protein powders (sponsored by supplement companies) and the like. These studies can't fully be trusted and needs to be scrutinised more than the rest. They're suspect, because their funding comes from a source that would benefit from a positive result, and the results should always be taken with a grain of salt. And very often, almost always in fact, these studies arrive at a positive result. They seemed more like marketing than science. That's more than 9. Here's how to stop them. If you want to read more about this topic as it pertains to nutritional science, check out Marion Nestle and her writings. She's quite brilliant. Why Calories Count by Marion Nestle. I found this book in a large box of bullshit that I ordered from Amazon two years ago. It was the only thing worth scavenging and I intend to read it after I'm done with a few horror novels. I figure that I'd be properly warmed up by then. A book about food politics and marketing shenanigans can get quite dark and depressing no doubt. But food companies are as unlikely to fund research on intermittent fasting, as Coca Cola is unlikely to fund research on ketogenic diets. What Alan brings up is the potential for bias on the researcher's part, Krista Varady to be specific. Aside from researching intermittent fasting, she is also involved in selling books, namely books based off of the research she is doing. While I haven't read The Every- Other- Day Diet, but I have mixed feelings about Krista Varady. She does try a bit too hard for my liking. I covered her work* before in . Note that I'm wrongfully referring to Varady as . In short, she published a pretty shitty review of the subject, but then again, there weren't that many data points around in 2. Five years later, it's gotten a little better, but there's still not enough good data around to draw any definitive conclusions - and like Alan says, a lot of that data comes from the same lab (Varady's). It's worth mentioning that Varady appeared in a laughable infomercial documentary called . In it, Michael Mosley - the show host and soon- to- be- author, interviews researchers working in the field of intermittent fasting and Varady is one of them. After rewatching the segment she appeared in, I found her to be matter of fact and professional even though she dutifully suffered through all the TV show gimmicks thrown at her - they gorged on hamburgers and fries to show that you could stuff your face and still lose weight on ADF, for example. By the way, this . Seems like there was some kind of falling out between Varady and Mosley after that. Don't waste your money. If you want a book on intermittent fasting, pick up Eat Stop Eat. Now, speaking of Varady, there's nothing wrong with pushing your agenda, but don't shove it down peoples throats by publishing bad research and doing shady shit like failing to disclose your conflicts of interest, because that makes you suspect in my eyes. That said, there's nothing fishy about her recent work, as far as I can tell. It's entirely possible that Varady and her colleagues got together one night and decided amongst themselves to doctor the results, but I find that very unlikely. It's kind of spooky, but a client just sent me this two minutes ago. I'm mentioned on the same page as Mosley and Varady, and I'm reading it just as I finish up this paragraph. I believe he was reading a book by his doctor, Robin Willcourt. I'll have to ask about the title, so I'll add it here later for those interested. Update: Name of the book is Chasing Antelopes: Why All This Caused All That. When fuckery strikes in science, it's usually a lot more subtle and sinister. I would know, because years ago, I approached Alan with this subject. See, I had uncovered some sophisticated tampering with the results of a study that received a lot of spin on social media and the mainstream news. I was slightly distressed over the fact that he had missed it - the studies appeared in the AARR, not only once, but twice - and presented my findings. I needed a second opinion, because maybe I was making a hen out of a feather. Nope. Alan agreed, it was some shady shit. In fact, it was a case study in deceit. Career- ending, if you ask me. But to this day, no one has debunked the findings, and the researcher is still active; polluting the journals with more bullshit for every new study that gets published. Who knows, maybe one day I'll put an end to it. The key point of all this, is that science can't be trusted for shit, unless you do your due diligence and read the fine print. But in this particular case, concerning Krista Varady, I'm not worried. Article continues below.. This limitation also plagues the body of research comparing various within- day meal frequencies. Readers familiar with my work know that Brad Schoenfeld, James Krieger, and I did a meta- analysis on the effect of meal frequency on body composition, and found that higher meal frequencies were associated with greater losses of fat mass and greater retention of lean mass (2. However, sensitivity analysis revealed that the removal of a single study (2. It’s worth noting that the studies in our analysis (and in this entire body of literature) lacked sufficient protein. An exception was Arciero et al (2. Furthermore, 6 meals per day increased lean mass despite hypocaloric conditions. MB: Sure thing. Something like that only happens in a study sponsored by EAS, Alan. Article continues below.. However, the question of muscle gain via IF remains unanswered since the investigative focus of IF research has been on weight/fat loss and accompanying clinical effects. No IF studies in the current literature have focused on the goal of gains in muscle size and/or strength. As such, No IF studies to- date (at least none that have passed peer review) have included a structured, progressive resistance training program. This is untreaded ground fresh for the taking by researchers with the desire to do so. Day Water Fast Results: Blood Ketones, Glucose & Weight. A walk- through of the 5- day water fast with the tracked results (ketones, glucose, weight) and the practical do’s and don’ts to make the most of the experience. I’m not a fan of cancer. The only people I’ve lost in memory – my grandfather and other close family – it was cancer that took them. NOT putting an end to the fun of life because of cancer has been a part of my plan since my early 2. So after my discussion with Dr. Thomas Seyfried in episode 1. I was looking forward to put his 5 day water fast “cancer insurance policy” to work. As I read into the details to start planning my prolonged fast what I found convinced me even more this was something I had to do soon. Maybe what I discovered would inspire you to try a 5 day fast soon too? Fasting for Reasons Beyond Cancer. Since getting bitten by a tick in Phuket, Thailand a few years ago I’ve been fighting some chronic health issues. I discovered that it’s probable that these are at least in some part due to lyme disease and babesiosis infections I only got documented earlier this year (and thus had never been treated for). It bears mentioning, since there’s a fair amount of non- rigorous and dubious material on the internet on the subject of lyme disease in particular, that this was documented via the Ig. M/ Ig. G labs, and met CDC criteria. What does this have to do with fasting? It comes down to this: Having a stronger immune system gives you a better chance of eliminating lyme. Since in cases like mine where it was not treated in the early stages it seems to be relatively tricky and long- winded to get rid of. I’ve made it a rule to collect and put into practice anything that improves the odds of a quicker recovery. Some of his recent work showed that prolonged fasts (e. Seyfried) can regenerate up to 3. Or in other words, a fast can eliminate old tired (and most probably damaged and dysfunctional) white blood cells and replace them with more effective shining new ones. I’ll admit this got me excited. It was definitely something I wanted to add into the “war plan” my integrative doctor and I had put in place against lyme and babesiosis. If you have any chronic health issue and are undergoing any treatments you should do the same.)As you’ll see below, the 5 day water fast (and other prolonged fasting configurations) has many potential upsides. After having gone through the experience and seeing the quantified results, I can say it’s something I will use as a tool frequently going forward. Most likely once per month, or once per quarter. The Upside: Reasons to Do a 5 Day Water Fast. Beyond the potential health and longevity upsides there were also a couple of others I was particularly interested in. First, the health benefits: Reduce future cancer risk or as a tool for those with cancer to combat it (details in this episode with Dr. Seyfried)Promote longevity and slow aging (via similar mechanisms to caloric restriction)Multi- system regeneration providing potential improvements in the immune system and mental performance (Valter Longo’s work – this 2. Reduce diabetes risk and cardiovascular disease risk and improve blood sugar regulation. The non- health benefits are perhaps more personal to me: Building greater mental resilience through the process of overcoming the challenge of a fast? The stoics used hard life experiences to learn to deal with the mental ups and downs of life more easily. Exposing yourself to more extreme hard challenges numbs you to the emotional pain and you find you become more indifferent to life’s ups and downs (read less reactive). You can read up on this in the book The Obstacle is the Way by Ryan Holiday (which I must have listened to 8+ times), or articles on the philosophy of stoicism on Tim Ferriss’ blog. A 5 day fast struck me as exactly the type of “safe but challenging experience” that builds mental resilience more generally. Once the fast is done, you realize it’s absolutely not a big deal. And other life challenges also seem to dim in their intensity and importance. A new life experience: What would it feel like to fast for 5 days? How would it effect my body? We should all experience the extremes of the human experience provided they are within the limits of safety and healthy. It’s an important tool to learn about ourselves, our limitations, strengths and weakneesses – self awareness is a skill that can be learned. Going to the extremes to get a real feel for the breadth of life is part of living a life well lived. It wasn’t till day 3 till I broke the 2 mmol/L threshold and went beyond, eventually peaking at nearly 7 mmol/L blood ketones. At the same time my blood glucose hit a stable low of just under 6. L. Overall, I felt less mentally sharp and found the fast hardest between the end of day 1 till around beginning of day 3. In my case the switch in the blood results follows closely the ease of the experience for me – once blood ketones and glucose inverted the experience was easier. Seyfried recommends the use of a Glucose- Ketone Index for monitoring the therapeutic value of the fast against cancer. The goal is to have your value of this index below 1 which is considered the . So I was in the therapeutic zone for all of days 4 and 5. Exactly on plan: My blood glucose, ketone and GKIC markers settled into the expected ranges Seyfried outlines in his book for the fast. That’s between 5. L for blood glucose, and between 6 and 7 mmol/L for ketones. Lagging Metabolism Adjustment at End of Fast. When I hit the 1. I dug into a couple of big bowls of bone broth. Quickly full and satisfied seemingly as if the fast had never taken place. The next day I had a higher carb than usual breakfast. We’re not talking crazy, just some blueberries and yacon syrup (for the gut, will talk about this soon in another episode) with bulletproof coffee (ghee, MCT oil and coffee). Despite this my ketones stayed high and actually hit their peak of the whole experiment (6. L) nearly 2. 4 hours after the fast had ended. This makes sense. It’s normal to see a lag of response of the blood readings the first 3 days of the fast while you adapt to ketones/ fatty acid metabolism. So it follows that there would be a lag in the switch back to primarily glucose metabolism. Was Weight Loss Permanent? Cycling into 5 day fasts say once per month, could be quite effect based on my data (~loss of 1 lb per day in terms of permanent weight loss, not just momentary during the fast). If weight loss isn’t desirable, which is my case, you’ll need to compensate to regain lost muscle weight post fast. Within a few days I had recovered one third (3 lbs) of the 9 lbs I’d lost during the fast. I consciously made an effort to eat as per usual to see if it the weight would naturally come back on. Two weeks later after the end of the fast (day 1. Actively compensating for this in between future fasts will require consciously eating to gain weight. HRV, Muse Calm and Mental Performance. I also tracked my HRV with the ithlete app, my daily meditation sessions with the Muse Calm and my mental performance via reaction tests at Quantifed Mind. These weren’t my main focus for this fast, so the data isn’t extensive enough to make any big conclusions. However, looking at what I collected, I plan to take a closer look at mental performance and HRV in future fasts. First thing in the morning HRV dipped at the start of the fast (day 1 and 2) and go back to my normal range from then on. This is a pretty good fit with how I felt during the fast. The first two days were a little rough as I had a headache, but from then on I felt more . Something to keep an eye on for future fasts especially as I have to deal with my own personal variable – adrenal fatigue. Adrenal Fatigue Confounder? I have documented adrenal fatigue currently (low cortisol output as a knock on effect of the chronic stress from lyme disease and babesiosis infections). I suspect the adrenal fatigue would be the cause of any negative HRV impact, and would be personal to me (if you’ve tracked HRV during a fast let me know your experience in the comments). This may have been behind or contributed to my less consistent sleep and shorter duration sleep as noted before. It is very common (even fashionable) to fast on meditation retreats. The idea the retreats promote is that fasting helps to calm the mind. Although I got my best Muse Calm score to date on one morning (8. I didn’t notice any real difference between fasting and my normal scores. The 5- Day Fast Experience. Two of my fellow entrepreneur buddies (Patrick Stiles and Patrick Kelly (@pjkmedia)) recently also did the 5 day water fast so we caught up to share notes on our experiences. Our experiences turned out to be pretty different in some areas. You can listen to our full note swapping discussion in this episode. Here’s the brief highlights of my experience from the discussion: Day 1 and day 2 were a little challenging in terms of hunger but not that noticeably (I put this down to my previous experience with intermittent fasting and ketogenic diets)A headache from the end of day 1 to the beginning of day 3 (potentially linked to the switch in brain from glucose to ketone use)On day 4 and 5 the physical weakness was a lot more noticeable and there was some slight dizzyness when standing up at times. My sister mentioned afterwards that she feared for her 1 year old son’s wellbeing when I was playing up close with him towards the end of the fast. Given the high ketone levels, this would mostly be due to high acetone levels in the breath. Fasting tends to lead to detoxification, and potentially stress your detoxification system, as you break down body fat including accumulated fat- soluble toxins and process them. While dealing with lyme these have occurred from time to time (added lyme biotoxin burden causing overload), so it’s unsurprising that adding broken down fat- soluble toxins would lead to this currently. I took activated charcoal daily to help bind and clear any toxins from my system. Day CRON Diet For Weight Loss and Longer Life. Michael Mosley presented in a recent BBC documentary the theory that a low- calorie diet extends life. He looked at 2 types of diet. Many people now call this form of fasting the “Michael Mosley diet”. CRON Diet. American research has shown that a “CRONy” diet can extend life. CRON stands for Calorie Restriction with Optimum Nutrition. This is not a very low- calorie diet, people stick to around 1. Calories a day. The key is that you eat a low protein, low- fat, high plant diet. The research with mice shows that a calorie restricted diet leads to a low level of the growth hormone called: Insulin Like Growth Factor One (IGF1), and this hormone is linked with longevity. Creation of New Neurons While Fasting. It seems that people who eat very little have less incidence of cancer, diabetes, heart disease, strokes and other conditions that tend to affect people in western civilizations today. Protein triggers increased IGF1 levels, which puts the body into “go go mode”, which means that it starts to grow rather than consolidate and repair. However, just eating less is not enough, you need to eat less protein and fewer calories. If you can stick to recommended guidelines for protein and calorie intake then this should be enough. The problem is that most people eat far too much. It is obviously very hard to accomplish this. Some celebrities have famously fasted their way to a slimmer body, however, there has always been a debate whether this is healthy. Prolonged fasting is certainly dangerous to health. Day Fast. Michael Mosley’s 3 day fast involved nothing but water, hot tea and a 5. Calorie powdered soup every day. The first couple of days are the hardest, but by the third day he was coping much better with the fast. On the third day he felt a little light- headed but was mostly feeling OK. Hunger comes in waves and then passes. By the third day he had used up all his glucose reserves and started burning fat for fuel and sugar. Of course, the test was to see if a 3 day fast did indeed reduce his IGF1 levels, and therefore, increase his body’s ability to repair itself. The results were as expected – his IGF1 levels had fallen to almost half of the level before the fast. However, you need to permanently switch to a low protein and plant- based diet to ensure that the IGF1 levels remain low. Also, it is recommended that you fast once per month to maintain the effect. The alternative is to be taking 8 different drugs a day by the time you hit your 6. Michael Mosley concluded that despite knowing and understanding all the benefits of fasting on a regular basis, he just could not bring himself to do it. Beyond Fasting – ADFHowever, the story does not end there. Dr Krista Varady of the University of Illinois at Chicago has been researching the positive effect of Alternate Day Fasting. Alternative day fasting involves eating one small meal on the fasting day and then as much as you like on the feeding day. Weight Loss With Alternate Day Fasting. Alternate day fasting. Dr Krista Varady. A big surprise was that it does not matter if you have a high fat diet on your feed days – the same health benefits are seen in high fat and low fat diets. Also, people do not tend to eat as much on the feed days. Rather than consume over 1. So, total calorie intake over the 2 days is lower. Aging and the Brain. New research by Professor Mark Mattson, a neuro- scientist in Baltimore. New neurons are grown during periods of fasting in the same way that exercise makes muscles grow. Hunger improved brain function, and fasting may be more beneficial than just following a lower calorie diet. Diet /. Michael stuck to this new lifestyle for 5 weeks. He ate breakfast as his main meal of the day. For ideas about eating see our page. He also dropped from the “overweight” category according to BMI and into the healthy weight category. The big news was that by fasting 2 days a week he made some big changes to his IGF1 levels by 5. Also his blood glucose levels fell, so he was at much lower risk of developing diabetes. His cholesterol levels fell too, which reduced his risk of heart disease. Although Michael Mosley had very positive results, it does not mean that it will work the same way for everyone. Michael has chosen to stick with the intermittent fasting as he wishes to avoid diabetes and cancer. Conclusion. Michael Mosley concluded that fasting was definitely a way to help people to manage health and reduce risk of developing the big killers in the West – heart disease, cancer and diabetes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
June 2017
Categories |